Home Movie Review Hindi Hindi Movie Review
Ravi Kumar directs this movie. With the lead characters Fagun Thakrar, Martin Sheen, Kal Penn, Mischa Barton, Tannishtha Chatterjee, and Rajpal Yadav. This

Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain Movie Review

Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain Movie Review Hindi
Review for the film " Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain"
Streaming On: Amazon Prime Video
Runtime: 1 Hour 30 Minutes
Certificate: U
Released: 07-11-2014
Genre: Drama
3.75 / 5.0
3.84 / 5.0

Ravi Kumar Ravi Kumar is an Indian Photographer best known fo >> Read More... directs this movie. With the lead characters Fagun Thakrar Fagun Thakrar is an English actress, born in Leice >> Read More... , Martin Sheen, Kal Penn Kalpen Suresh Modi also known as Kal Penn is an Ac >> Read More... , Mischa Barton,  Tannishtha Chatterjee Tannishtha Chatterjee is a famous actress of Bolly >> Read More... , and  Rajpal Yadav Rajpal Yadav, the hilarious Indian movie actor, ac >> Read More... . This story was based on real events. The director thought of making this film when he read a book on it.

PLOT:

This story is about the disaster that took place in Bhopal in 1984. An auto-rickshaw driver named Dilip broke down his rickshaw and lost his source of income. To fulfil his daily wages he gets a job in Union Carbide plant as a worker. He lives nearby to the plant in a slum with his wife, sister and a son. After some point of time, the officials started neglecting the safety measures because there were no sales of pesticide.

The guy named Roy who was in charge of the maintence concern of the plant, tried to explain the officials the growing problem of the plant, but on the other hand he was ignored. A worker was killed when the methyl isocyanate leaked on his hand. The owners quoted this incident as the worker's irresponsibility.

And the plant continues the operation. Roy saved the plant to leak by mixing water to the acid. The officials destroy the warning siren to avoid and any misconceptions that would lead on the way of plant. The CEO of the factory pays a visit to the plant where he is informed to connect two additional tanks for the acid and with that the output will be increased. Motwani a reporter tries to explain Dilip about the upcoming leak that was going to occur.

On the other hand Dilip arranged a loan for the wedding of his sister. Even Roy was indulged in explaining him about, the problem Fanalthat about to occur, as the company had destroyed the warning siren and have neglected all the safety and maintenance measures. Dilip was advised to be quiet if he wants to continue his job by Roy and he himself resigns from the company. The growing loss made the officials to shut down the plant.

And to fire many workers, Dilip was one of them. The fault in the tanks made the gas leak from the plant heading east. The guests at the wedding start getting discomfort. Dilip's wife and other family relatives were dead on the spot; he took his son are and flees from there. A nearby hospital was filled with thousands of patients because of this gas poisoning, but lack of antinode caused many people's death. The movie ended with present day, a blind man holding the identity badge of Dilip.

ANALYSIS:

The movie received average reviews from the audience. On a whole, the cast did a great job on acting the part. This movie was to release in 2010, the lack of distributors caused in delay of release date. The direction was way too superb.

The cinematography of the film was good. The main motto of this film was convinced by the events that took place. Many people, who didn’t know about the Gas Tragedy that happened, were over whelmed after watching this movie. The American actors had done great in this movie.

STAR PERFORMANCES:

Every star in this movie had a great performance on their part. Rajpal Yadav for the first time was seen this way. His energetic role proved to be in positive reviews for the film. American actors were also included in this movie. Tannishtha Chatterjee and Fagun Thakrar didn’t disappoint.

WHAT’S THERE:

1) A good script carried this movie far better than expected; people didn’t show much interest as it was something related to history, and this young generation desires for entertainment.

2) This movie has covered many real events that happened at the time of that tragedy.

3) Visualization and cinematography were splendid.

WHAT’S NOT THERE:

1) It was a low budget movie, so there were no distributors because of which the promotion was not as expected.

2) The film could have been more realistic.

VERDICT:

Must watch the film, for all. As it is a historical movie, the main reason of this tragedy is shown in this movie.


LATEST MOVIE REVIEWS


Upcoming

29 Mar, 2024

Upcoming

29 Mar, 2024

Upcoming

29 Mar, 2024

Upcoming

29 Mar, 2024

Upcoming

29 Mar, 2024

Upcoming

29 Mar, 2024

Upcoming

29 Mar, 2024

Upcoming

29 Mar, 2024

Upcoming

29 Mar, 2024

Upcoming

10 Apr, 2024

Upcoming

19 Apr, 2024